Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2013 9:38:04 GMT -5
Mr. Addison, Honorary Fellow in the School of History, Classics and Archæology at the University of Edinburgh, has kindly popped out for a moment in order to communicate to us the following facts:
In 1901 there were more than 1.3 million indoor domestic servants in Britain, nine out of ten of them female. The keeping of a servant or servants was one of the most significant dividing-lines distinguishing the middle and upper classes from the vast prolétariat around them. The number of servants a household could "afford" was, likewise, a very precise indicator of social status. In the Grossmiths' Diary of a Nobody, Mr. and Mrs. Pooter of "The Laurels," Brickfield Terrace, employed a single maidservant. When Mr. and Mrs. Winston Churchill set up home at 33, Eccleston Square, they did so with a staff of eight, all female except for the hall boy.
"Snobberies of various kinds were 'rampant'," declares Mr. Addison. "Factory girls looked down on country girls in service as rural half-wits. Country girls, raised to defer to the gentry, looked down on factory girls as loud, loose and vulgar."
I am with the country girls there! What about other members?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2013 9:47:26 GMT -5
If I may address your question directly, Sydney Grew: " ... I am with the country girls there! What about other members?" I suppose that when factory girls are described as " ... loud, loose and vulgar", I think of Carmen (in Bizet's opera of the same name)! On balance, I am probably with Carmen and the factory girls, Sydney Grew, although it is a close call for kleines c. There is always going to be a conflict between town and country, and in 2008, for the first time in history, half the global population had moved to towns. By 2050, three-quarters of us might live in towns. So urban girls are finally in the majority (women outnumber men, if only just)?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2013 2:35:21 GMT -5
So urban girls are finally in the majority (women outnumber men, if only just)? TOWIE. That is a profoundly distrubing statistic you have served up there kleins c.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2013 2:52:27 GMT -5
As we both know, Parva Porcus, statistics can be easily misinterpreted, so I would not necessarily get too disturbed by the increasing dominance of cities, nor the rise of the megacity during the twenty-first century. Wikipedia - MegacityOn topic, of course, the servant question is a bit out of date, Sydney Grew, as relatively few people now employ (m)any domestic servants. In defence of country girls, however, I would add that they are arguably closer to nature than their city sisters, Parva Porcus, if that helps?
|
|
|
Post by neilmcgowan on May 23, 2013 9:39:41 GMT -5
Servants are essential to the plots of baroque operas. There would be no bass or mezzo-soprano roles otherwise
|
|